A dated record of RI technical publications, interoperability proposals, research attribution and the boundaries of published evidence.
Responsibility Infrastructure is an architecture through which responsibility can remain intelligible, provable and usable across organisational and system boundaries. It separates recording, verification, recognition, registry, resolution and reliance so their functions can be understood distinctly.
Each published source identifies its author, status, scope and evidence basis.
AI assurance is one application of Responsibility Infrastructure; Responsibility Infrastructure is not limited to AI. It can apply wherever responsibility crosses organisational, institutional or system boundaries across people, organisations and machines.
The same architecture can be applied where responsibility must remain explicit and provable across human, organisational and machine boundaries in healthcare, finance, transport, public services, industry and other sectors.
The RI Standard and RI Protocol describe the wider architecture and proposed requirements within their declared scope.
Separate working proposals examine the common semantics and exchange behaviour needed for independent implementations.
The minimum shared boundary concerns the responsibility information and exchange behaviour independent systems need to preserve meaning across organisations and technologies.
Where expressly released, supporting schemas, reference code, validators, fixtures and conformance tests form part of that interoperability surface. The layer is intended to support human-to-human, human-to-machine, machine-to-human and machine-to-machine exchange across online, intermittently connected, offline and air-gapped conditions with later reconciliation.
The public site distinguishes descriptive material, normative publications, evidence records and interoperability artefacts. Each identified publication states its own status, scope and applicable licence or permitted-use terms.
Internal implementation choices that are not part of an applicable public specification are outside the public conformance claim. Compatibility should therefore be assessed against the identified publication and version rather than inferred from similarity to a particular implementation.
RI keeps technical records. La Touche publishes its own research.
An implementation claiming conformance must identify the applicable publication, role, scope and version and satisfy the corresponding requirements. Interoperability conformance is a bounded technical and semantic claim; it does not automatically establish broader RI Standard or Protocol conformance, Recognition, Registry standing or authority for external reliance.
Independent suppliers should be able to implement any agreed minimum shared requirements using their own technologies. No unrelated private RI requirement or vendor service should become a mandatory condition without explicit inclusion and suitable rights.
Responsibility Infrastructure documents a founder-originated technical architecture for preserving responsibility information across organisational and system boundaries. Its publications record proposed requirements, governance and technical definitions, not an externally approved consensus standard. Any future standards-development process would determine its own scope, publication form, terminology and requirements.
AI assurance is one application of Responsibility Infrastructure; Responsibility Infrastructure is not limited to AI. It can apply wherever responsibility crosses organisational, institutional or system boundaries across people, organisations and machines.
RI's current position is established by its published technical documents, recorded evidence and their stated versions and status.
The proposed shared boundary covers the minimum responsibility information and exchange behaviour needed for independent systems to preserve responsibility meaning. Applicable requirements and implementation rights are identified in each publication.
RI has published technical proposals and traceable publication records. La Touche's research exercises are separately attributed to the organisation that conducted them, with their own methods, outcomes and limits.
Contributors publish research and implementation tests under their own attribution. RI maintains its technical and governance publications separately, with evidence and assessment status recorded at the source.
Conformance is assessed against a named publication, role, scope and version. Verification, Recognition, Registry standing and external reliance are separate determinations.
The working proposal is implementation-neutral. Any required exchange format or binding must be specified publicly and justified by the applicable interoperability requirements.
Independent suppliers can implement the published common boundary using their own technologies without purchasing a La Touche product. Claims of conformance remain limited to the applicable requirements and evidence.
Updated .