Responsibility Infrastructure
Responsibility Infrastructure
Standards for Provable Responsibility
RI PROTOCOL INTEROPERABILITY

Interoperability evidence register

The authoritative public record of completed, bounded tests showing how Responsibility Infrastructure Protocol semantics behave when represented from and consumed independently of unrelated systems.

Evidence status

Implementation evidence is now published.

Responsibility Infrastructure is supported by published implementation evidence in addition to its conceptual and normative material. Two completed bounded external-system tests demonstrate source representability and receiver independence under the stated test conditions.

Elydora and GhostDrift each produced the same bounded pattern: Representability passed, Receiver Independence passed, Responsibility Completeness remained partial, and full RI conformance was not established.

These results support a bounded interoperability claim only. They do not establish universal interoperability, certification, Recognition, Registry standing, regulatory approval or adoption by the source systems.

RI-INTEROP-ELYDORA-001
Completed

Elydora

External-system representability and receiver independence

Third-party system identified for factual interoperability testing. No endorsement, partnership, certification or participation is implied.

Representability
PASS
Responsibility Completeness
PARTIAL
Receiver Independence
PASS
Overall
PARTIAL
RI Conformance
NOT ESTABLISHED
Finding

A clean generic RI receiver consumed the RI record using only RI fields. It required no Elydora SDK, Elydora source, Elydora-specific branching, LROS, La Touche Rail or vendor cooperation. Supported facts were preserved and unsupported responsibility facts remained explicit gaps.

Claims boundary

This test does not establish Elydora adoption, endorsement, certification, RI conformance, Recognition, Registry standing, regulatory approval or participation in an RI network.

RI-INTEROP-GHOSTDRIFT-001
Completed

GhostDrift

External-system representability and receiver independence

Source attribution: GhostDrift Mathematical Research Project. Third-party system identified for factual interoperability testing. No endorsement, partnership, certification or participation is implied.

Representability
PASS
Responsibility Completeness
PARTIAL
Receiver Independence
PASS
Overall
PARTIAL
RI Conformance
NOT ESTABLISHED
Finding

A separately located generic RI receiver consumed the frozen RI record and preserved the tested mapped values without GhostDrift-specific branching or invention of missing responsibility facts.

Claims boundary

The test preserves the distinction between formal verifier acceptance and operational responsibility. It does not establish GhostDrift adoption, endorsement, certification, RI conformance, Recognition, Registry standing or participation in an RI network.

Third-party attribution

Names of external systems, projects and organisations are used solely to identify the subject of a documented interoperability test. All associated names, marks and intellectual property remain with their respective rights holders. Inclusion in an RI test record does not indicate endorsement, adoption, certification, partnership or participation in Responsibility Infrastructure unless expressly stated.

Implementation pathway

Next test class: independent production.

The next interoperability milestone is independent production: an external organisation implementing the public RI Protocol within its own architecture and generating an RI-native Responsibility Record for consumption by a generic receiver.

Planned tests are not counted as completed evidence until the relevant artefacts and results have been produced and preserved.

Testing discipline

RI interoperability testing is versioned and designed to expose ambiguity, missing semantics and implementation dependency. A PARTIAL or FAIL result is retained as evidence rather than rewritten as success.